Unity and diversity in Anglicanism

Editor’s note: The following post arises from small group reflections from The Rise of Global Christianity, 1910–2010, taught by Dr. Todd Johnson at Boston University in the Fall of 2010. Led by doctoral students, the small groups discussed lectures given by Christian scholars in various disciplines, including significant changes that have occurred in global Christianity over the past 100 years.

On October 27th, we had an opportunity to hear about Anglicanism and its globalization by Rev. Dr. Ian Douglas. After his lecture, our group shared general reflections on his lecture.

We first talked about the history of Anglicanism, particularly over its beginning. During the lecture, Dr. Douglas posits that the Henry VIII divorce issue was not the most important issue but several students expressed different views. For example, one student argued that divorce problem of the English king was indeed a turning point, although, the issue of contextualization, as Dr. Douglas mentioned, was also very important. Other students agreed that we cannot ignore the historical fact that English reformation had something to do with complicated issues including political, social, and religious motivations.

After that, we talked at length about the “unity within diversity slogan” of the Anglican Church. One student pointed out that the concept of unity within diversity must be a recent concept since Anglican Church pre-American colonialism was rather intolerant. For example, the very reason why the Puritans wanted to make a new society was something to do with the intolerance of Anglicanism. In addition, the works of George Whitefield and John Wesley, who were ordained ministers of Anglican Church, were also criticized within Anglicanism. The other student agreed with him and added that he believed that the Anglican Church exported a universal Anglicanism in its colonial endeavors. However, we all agreed that the current Anglican Communion model can serve as a good model for the 21st century global church. And all students said that they learned a lot from today’s lecture about the important concept of “diversity and unity.”

Hye Jin Lee, discussion moderator

Thoughts on African Instituted Churches

Editor’s note: The following post arises from small group reflections from The Rise of Global Christianity, 1910–2010, taught by Dr. Todd Johnson at Boston University in the Fall of 2010. Led by doctoral students, the small groups discussed lectures given by Christian scholars in various disciplines, including significant changes that have occurred in global Christianity over the past 100 years.

On October 6th, Dr. Nimi Wariboko lectured on AICs (African Initiated Churches or African Independent Churches), dealing with important issues of African Christianity such as African’s definition of religion and salvation; the nature of prosperity gospel; and reasons of the AIC’s rapid growth in Africa.

After the lecture, our members shared their reflections on his lecture. At first, our discussion centered on the fine line between syncretism and contextualization of AIC. Some students showed interested in AIC’s successful contextualization, but other students criticized their blending of two traditions, namely Christianity and African traditional religion. But to this critic, one student pointed out that we should not blame or put down one syncretism and uphold our own syncretism. He thought that it might be true that African Christians may do it with traditional religions, but churches in the west tend to do the same with materialism. Thus we must be gentle in our approach. Other students agree that we should recognize our own syncretism first before criticizing AIC’s syncretism.

Some critical comments against AICs were heard about AIC’s prosperity gospel (of course the prosperity gospel is not limited to AIC): One student criticized the so called prosperity gospel since it is materializing the gospel. Another student agreed with him saying that the prosperity gospel can be dangerous because it sometimes correlates salvation with the external and material. He added, “the New Testament speaks extensively about apostles having little in the eyes of the world.” Some students also showed concerns over the fact that many African preachers became preachers without proper theological background.

However, many students found positive aspects of AIC’s total or holistic understanding of salvation which includes not just saving souls but also saving bodies, which can be extended to saving all creatures. One student explains more about the holistic notion of salvation in Africa by mentioning some AIC’s tradition of confessing ecological sins. According to him, in some AIC, people confess sins against nature (for example, I cut down trees but did not plant new ones) in baptismal ceremony. And this comment made students think about ecological sins committed by western Christians.

At the end of discussion one student pointed out that Dr. Wariboko’s lecture was too focused on describing distinct characteristics of African Pentecostalism. He commented that we should more emphasize on the common traits of AIC as Christian community that above and beyond the cultural influence. Due to the lack of time, we could not talk much about this issue, but one student replied that the simple fact that Pentecostal churches are focusing on the presence of the Holy Spirit should be considered as a sign that they focus on common experiences with other Pentecostal churches outside Africa.

Hye Jin Lee, discussion moderator